Whining revisited

Still snowing.  (Well, it was three hours ago.  Now, it’s the Kentucky Derby and I don’t care about snow, just about horses.)

New word (I’ve hit a run of interesting ones lately):

moustery

Define, define, define – I love when you do it, and I get startled out of my brown study by my own laughing. This one begs – maybe too easy?

Okay, I think I figured something out.  You know how, if you don’t eat enough calories, your metabolism goes into starvation mode?  I think we’re wired to conserve everything we’ve got, once the body calculator gets enough evidence, gleaned completely from endocrine and nervous system activity, to support the assumption that something catastrophic, like a famine, is happening in the world outside.  So it won’t burn the fat stores until it absolutely has to.

Well, the other day when I wrote long and sad—I couldn’t do anything all day.  Finally, so much accumulated fretting and worry and processing (brake and gas pedal both to the metal at the same time), that the body simply cut off everything but life support.  Has that ever happened to you, when you can hardly keep your eyes open, and you weigh five million tons, and your eyes keep closing and the lethargy is almost drug like?  Indication: you have been living on adrenaline for so long, you’re lucky you can still fuel your heart and lungs.  Physical response: stop all systems and conserve in case something really, really bad happens (like being chased by a train, or getting knocked into a sewer, or getting an audit notice) and you have to run like the devil. (???)

Then – in the afternoon – we got the news.  Not only had the dead-beat seller actually signed the closing papers the day before (nice, don’t you think, of them to tell us?), but the missing forms had come and the whole deal was done.  And the drywall almost finished.  Amazingly, suddenly—I got on my feet and WALKED.  In fact, I tore out all the bad design mistakes in my knitted horse, fixed my dad’s messed up .paf file, set up my laptop for Monday’s massive quilt shoot and emptied the dishwasher.  A-Mazing adaptability, yes?

Being the mom is so much fun.  Even when you are no longer responsible for the entire universe, you still feel like you are.

Here’s another thing I think: there are times when big decisions have to be made, when situations are coming at you—thing that are going to have a huge impact on all the lives you are responsible for.  Big questions to be answered.  But not enough data yet to answer them, or to plan the next move.

You are left with all options Opn: what will we do if . . . .  And these are things you can’t just play by ear.  Things that have to be responded to logistically almost immediately.  Does anybody know what I’m talking about?  So you have to work out every possible outcome and plan for every one of them, having not enough information to pare down the possibilities.

That’s when you start wishing the wave would just hit you—because then you could actually DO something.

Maybe waiting is always the hardest part of anything.  I know it was for childbirth.

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

More Whining

More snow.

There are women who, when faced with a house crammed with chaos, roll up their sleeves, organize a livable arrangement out of the mess, never let the dust settle, and carry on with strength and confidence.  I am not one of these women.  And there are women who have great visions of how a room should be—who can pick colors of paint and carpet and figure out where to put the furniture, and design the heck out of every little detail.  I’m not one of them, either.

Instead, I curl up in the corner of the couch, feeling like there’s all this stuff I have to do, and not having the faintest idea how to do any of it.  This has not been my best day.

I wrote a bunch of essays last weekend, meaning to post them this week.  But they’re long and wordy and probably stupid.  And there should be pictures, except I’d have to find my desk to pull them together, and I’m not sure I can do that.

There’s just all this stuff that’s been in process for the last five months.  All out of my control, really – but how can a mom who is used to bossing the universe stand by and wait?  And then these other stupid things happen.  I haven’t written about these huge things we’ve been trying to pull off, because I’m not sure they’d interest anybody else, and because they’re too big, and too complicated.  Like this:

1. When the house across the street from them went up for short sale, C and L decided to buy it.  That was last summer.  After presenting about four offers over a period of five months (the selling agent was about as lousy an agent as I have EVER come across), they were told that the thing was under contract and there was no chance for them.  So they found another house a couple of blocks away, and made an offer on that.  (The magic part of the story is that they seriously wanted to stay in the area – near us.  That’s the part I need to remember through all this.)  Then the first house came available again.

It began to come clear that the people who were living in the house hadn’t been paying the bank anything for months, and were dragging their feet as long as they could, living rent free.

2. C and L needed to sell their house, and Chaz wanted it.  So another pile of paperwork started building.  Two kids trying to qualify for loans in a death-bed-repentance credit market, and two sales depending on each other for success.  Two sets of underwriting and inspections and appraisals—with the wild card of the Reluctant Sellers thrown in.  And nothing I could do about any of it.

3.  The addition to the house ran into some snarls.  It was supposed to take about six weeks, but I swear I’ve been sleeping on those couches now for six months, and I don’t know where my clothes are, or basically, where anything is.  But I did pay our business property tax on time, after I spent three hours trying to find the forms.

4.  My bones aren’t dense enough.

5. On one of those supposed-to-be peaceful and restful Sunday afternoons two weeks ago, Rachel and her whole family (that’s seven kids and a beautiful husband) were almost killed when a nebbish in a double cab, metal-flaked, chrome roll-barred truck came off the freeway, changed his mind and pulled a U to get back on again, right in front of their Suburban.  The Suburban is dead.  The family is alive.  But we weren’t sure all their parts were there until we’d spent several hours in the emergency room.

6. I hadn’t been home from that little party for ten minutes, when our CO/natural gas alarm went off.  Which led to our sitting outside for over an hour, waiting for the gas tech to come and find the problem or the house to blow up, whichever came first.  The guy turned out to be a neighbor from down the way and stayed to chat for a few hours, which pretty much put eight hours of peaceful and restful in a drawer till another day.

7. Tuesday, my sis from Texas came a-visiting, and we were heading up to the outlet stores in Park City for some fun.  This was the day when C and L were finally supposed to be closing on their house.  We stopped at their place on the way, only to find out that there was some brou-ha-ha about funds and documentation that I actually could do something about.  Which I did.  Then we left for our fun.

Cam was working, so the whole load of tension and work to make the thing happened was pretty much on L’s shoulders.  So there we were, driving selfishly away from her – an hour on our way through pretty terrible traffic, when my iPhone starts ringing, only it’s playing a song I NEVER put on that thing.  And then the car started making this soft doorbell noise.  And I was trying to talk Kev through answering an iPhone, which can be daunting if you’ve never done it, while at the same time trying not to get us dead on that crowded freeway.

I had stolen L’s iPhone.  In the middle of EVERYTHING, I make a mistake like that – sticking it in my bag as we left her house.  Like, why would I assume that the iPhone on her counter was mine?  And why on THAT INSANE CRUX OF A DAY?   In the end, Cam sent a runner down to her with HIS iPHone, and we answered hers all day, directing all the calls to Cam’s number –

And that is why I am curled up on the couch, waiting for all of this to be over.  I’m trying not to think how long it will take me to get a back hoe in here to clean out the dust and the mounds of misplaced furniture.  Or how many little projects are going to spin off of this room building business – like doing tile in the front hall to hide the spot where the puppies ate the old Congolium, and in the bathroom that’s presently raw sheetrock and exposed subfloor.

Have I explained now why I haven’t answered comments or seen any human beings in the last long time? Is my life any stupider than anybody else’s?  I really do want to write about all this other stuff, but I think I’ve lost my confidence.

Oh – I have another word for you – for the six of you who read this thing.  Another safety word:

Forkdort.

Please define it. Please.  I think it might hold the key to understanding the universe.

Posted in whining | Tagged , , , , , | 14 Comments

:*/Sproing*:

Pictures of spring to follow.  But first, a little verbal sparring:

Define: dicasity

Rachel: As for the word dicasity: that would be me! :D

Marilyn: Dicasity: the ability of something to be die-cast? Zinc has a high dicasity, broccoli has a low dicasity.

Jane: Dicasity is a double dose of perspicacity, therefore, extra special insight.

Chaz: Dicasity: the strange duality of “reality”. Allows that people, things and situations can be seen from more than one perspective, thus giving rise to the very confusing notion that there is never a single “actual” reality.

Gin: Diecasity–the probability that there will be only be two possible outcomes to a scenario. Like heads or tails.

Rachel:  Di meaning two, Cas; a type of cheese made in romainia, ity; a state of quality or clarity

Dicastiy: Two of the most exquisite, superlative hunks of cheese made in Romainia

THE STORY OF THE ROYAL DICASITY:

The King of Romainia turns to his wife the Queen and says: My dear our two sons, Chedder and Provolone are feeling that their younger brother Swiss is very argumentative and has many holes in his holier than thou attitude.

The Queen of Romania turns to her husband the King and says: Cheddar has no reason to be sharp with his brother Swiss just becuase he has a few holes in his personality and his sister Brie is so soft she grates upon his nerves.

The King of Romania turns to his wife the Queen and says: That is no excuse. Swiss will have more wisdom as he ages. Here is what I propose. If we toast them at the royal banquet they’ll all be the same. Everything will smooth out.

A second from Jane, one of my OLDEST friends:

Just thought of the other, much more obscure and rare meaning of the word:

The owning of two vacation homes in Mexico (preferably in Zihuatanejo or Cabo, and Playa del Carmen or thereabouts).

What makes you think that more than 5 people are reading the blog?  ;>

Me: STABBED T0 The HEART.

—–=0=—–

I LOVE THESE.  EVERY ONE OF THEM!!! You guys have such interesting minds!

Were there any more?  Really – only five (now six) of you had the chutzpha to sally forth???  Remember my birthday wish?  That EVERY DARN ONE OF YOU would send me, on May 8th, your favorite tried and true poil of wisdom??? (read: pearl)  I hope there is FAR more chutzpah on that day, and sassiness, and silliness and sweet earnestness and that the very rafters ring with folksy wisdom.

Okay: here is my definition of dicasity: the state of being arising from any condition after a decision has been firmly made.  She was married; it was a matter of dicasity.  He couldn’t overcome the dicasity; there was no turning back now.  Also, dicastic: The man’s dicastic attitude sent him over the rail. Etymology: rising from the phrase, “The die is cast.”

Okay—the door is still open.  Looking for more possible definitions.  So wail away, my dears, and don’t let the sun set on your audacity.

——=0=——

Pictures of the spring and “spring,”

(for April is the cruelest month.)

2010-04-17MushroomsStump

Strange fungus.  Levi would like this.  But I like it, too.  Happily, the puppies don’t seem interested.

2010-04-17Forsythia02

I love forsythia against pine.

2010-04-17LilyValley03

Budding lily of the valley.  If you listen very hard when the flowers appear, you may smell the delicate scent of youth and love and mystery.

2010-04-17BlueBell02

I can’t remember what these are called. (Grape Hyacinth)   They’re common as dirt and volunteer on a regular basis, but when you look at them closely, they’re strikingly beautiful.

2010-04-17DaffsTriple01

Some say that “daffodill” means something like “David’s star” or “David’s flower.”  This would be a Welsh idea – Daffid being David.  And the star is five pointed.  Other people think the flower’s name comes from some French root – but the root of that, they can’t really parse out.

2010-04-20violetsBirchroot02

Violets and birch roots.

2010-04-20Fosythia01

Forsythia, braving the world outside the fence.

2010-04-20LightInBirch04

Leaves, like stained glass, strain the light and turn it colors.

2010-04-20LightInBirch07

I loved these glowing bits.

2010-04-21ForsythiaStormTuinei01

April.  April.  Make up your mind, surely.

Before it’s too late, and you’re gone before you get here.

Posted in Fun Stuff, Images, Seasons, The outside world | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

For Sam

This began as a response to comment – in a comment of my own.  But it grew.  And it wasn’t what I wanted to write about today.  And it isn’t arguing with Sam.  The fact is that Sam and Mar both say things to me that get my mind, screaming against the rust in the machine, thinking.  Provocative little souls.  And this one, I guess, really started the engine.  Not in rebuttal, because we aren’t debating – just in figuring out my own two cents.  If I make a fool of myself, I know that Dick will find those places and twit me with them, which is fine.  All of you are allowed to twit me.  I deserve it.

So this was inspired by Sam’s comment on the last post.  About children and media:

Sam:  I am super pleased that you put that link up here.  I’m not that hot about Community (which is a smart little TV show, but a little too – well, maybe I’ll give it another chance), and I’d like to talk to him more about these ideas, but I came away from that letter really liking the guy.  He also didn’t factor in the Henry-male data, but that doesn’t always hold true, anyway.

[I’m going to stop and apologize here for answering only one of these comments – but life has grown hair, and I might even get to write about it today while I huddle in a corner of the couch, shivering – rain, rain, go away – please don’t make me go out to find food – oh, how I wish I had my bathroom back. ]

Here’s the way I see this: I remember myself as a kid, and I remember seeing a couple of things I found deeply disturbing on TV.  One of them was a scene from a movie, and why I saw it, I’ll never know—it wasn’t like my mom was casual about leaving the TV on, and this definitely wasn’t a cartoon.

I won’t describe it, I will only say that it shocked me, terrified me, and it has never left me.  There’s a black and purple drawer in my head that pops open when I come too close to it and that thing and some others come roaring back out.

But then, there are other drawers in there too, that are more subtle – full of  little things in films and on TV and in songs – things that left splinters in my growing concepts about the truth of love and of sex and of how people think and treat each other – things that have made burls in my thought, so deep in there, I probably don’t know they are there, mis-shaping the truth.  (Funny that I don’t include books – as I think about it, I don’t think that the impact the ideas in a book have on me is anywhere near as piercing.)

But then, most of these things are ultimately written by twenty somethings who really don’t know very much about the underlying truths of humanity, who are – in effect – trying to run with their perspectives of life before they’ve really learned to crawl.  And many of them (us) are social cast-outs who pride themselves on their quirky and superior views of the rest of us.  If they even think that deeply.  I mean, whoever put Transformers together was not nearly as concerned with human truths as with really cool mechanical design and special effects.

And I wonder how many people who write “for” children even HAVE children.  Or really give a hang about them?  Because money is the real concern in all of this.  And burping and farting sell more tickets than thoughtful and responsible homage to truth ever will.

All of this said, I don’t know why it’s all that important that I turn my kids’  brains over to these guys at ALL, least of all lend them over a period of hours to the tender mercies of an industry that is dedicated to creating a very believable virtual reality out of nothing.

But the fact is that I love movies.  I love stories.  I love songs.  And I have taken hurts from all of them, but I’ve also been made to think by all of them.  That said, we are talking about children who do not have a wide experience of what is real and what is not, and so few tools with which to sort out media experiences.

And as I begin to write this, I see myself, suddenly realizing that maybe the fact that  I feel like the world is in a hopeless tailspin of urgency and violence and danger – is because I watch the news.  Because the news, as everyone knows, makes money by picking the most sensational bits out of a wide, pedestrian-colored fabric of reality in which most people go about their business every day without dying in an airplane crash or being crushed by meteors.  “At any given moment” — there are some in which there are no earthquakes and floods ANYWHERE. Maybe even some when there are no rapes or abuses. But I find myself feeling responsible for and apprehensive about every single bad thing that may happen at some point on the globe as though that boring fabric really is ALL about these things.  That bad things WILL happen and DO happen to almost EVERY PERSON, EVERY MINUTE.  All because out of an hour of news, every minute is troubling.

My mind, then, even as an adult with almost 6 decades under my capacious little belt, is that easily colored by — media.

Children expect, I think, that all reality is probably consistent with what they live every day.  And little children should have the right to think it’s all lambs and puppies (which are actually pretty frightening, if you are short enough to be face to face with them) and flowers and cookies.

I think there’s nothing wrong with a young child  – and I don’t know how young I even mean – maybe even ten year olds – seeing the world as a basically safe and supportive place.  They don’t need “interesting” elements added, because the small child’s life, while seeming boring to the jaded adult mind, finds the magical advance of a con-trail-dragging jet way up there in the sky to be WAY interesting.  Little children are charmed when they hear dogs barking blocks away – while an adult won’t even notice (unless it’s to be annoyed).

Everything is new and fresh to a child.  Everything is a problem that has to be worked through  – from standing up and balancing successfully to the wonders of the tech they’re not supposed to mess with, to color and grass and climbing and figuring out why people say no, and learning ENGLISH from basics to the much more mysterious vagaries. We don’t have to make things loud and fast and tense for children.  Their senses are already engaged.  They don’t need our help.

And when you turn the volume up on sound or color or tension – you are screaming into their faces.

So why do we do it?

When I brought this up, talking about the Dragon movie, it was because that movie was pitched to move ME.  I’ve been around the planet a few times.  I’m exhausted with drama and emotion.  Bored with reality.  I want magic.  I want an adventure that I don’t actually have to live through and manage myself.  I want risk that won’t leave me permanently injured.

Children already have enough to do.

Children grow up very quickly.  They work through problems at a rate that would leave an adult brain, after about two hours of  the same work, yearning just to watch TV.

Dramatic tension—to the degree that I am moved to feel it—in a really well-engineered entertainment is almost always going to be way too much for kids.

And maybe Dan is right.  Maybe many of them are not intelligent enough to see past the shwooshing color and dramatic music to understand that something scary is happening.  Maybe.

[Major digression: remember, please, that people like you, Sam, practice for hours everyday to achieve verisimilitude in your work – you labor over every tiny shadow, every line of character, even the color you use in building a character.  And along with you on the credits of a movie are hundreds of others, maybe in the thousands – all people who have spent thousands of hours perfecting their tiny bit of craft so that every aspect of the audience sensibility is controlled – all that brain chemistry carefully run by You guys—so that the two hours’ experience is THE MOST POWERFUL experience (of whatever kind) that body has ever experienced.  So that when that body walks out of the theater, its mouth is going to be saying, “WOW.  THAT WAS BRILLIANT.  I’M GOING TO BUY ANOTHER TICKET AND SEE IT AGAIN>  AND I’M TAKING MY ENTIRE FAMILY AND THE WHOLE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT WITH ME.”

Which is fine.  Adults have to take responsibility for their own reactions to their choices.

But we take our children into a theater—why?  So they will be able to have a fun experience?  We walk them up the aisle.  Find them a seat.  Maybe get them popcorn.

And them tell them to hold still while 987 artists drop a sensory semi-truck on their heads.

Again: why do we do it?

So I will have to say that Marilyn and I sit very close on this one.

In the end, I want to say that good parenting is not easy.  Not causal.  It’s a matter of eternal effort, study, awareness and diligence.  It’s up to parents to know each child for who he is – because children are all different, each with his own learning and thinking patterns, maturity levels, needs.

And it’s also up to each parent to keep eyes open and minds awake: a thing which many people don’t do even in defense of their own little selves.  If grown-ups actually paid attention to the real realities around them, nobody would smoke, nobody would get drunk, nobody would be overweight, invest with slick characters, and nobody would come anywhere near pornography – or really, really dumbed-down books, no matter how romantic they may seem.

The thing that worries me is that there’s obviously a lot of all that going on in the world all the time.  And these adults, who cannot even look after themselves (ourselves) are arrogant enough to think they can raise a child?

In the end, you can only do your best.  But how many of us even try to do our best?  Too busy with our own lives to realize that the purpose of our lives after we have children IS the children.

All of that ranted, each parent has to, in intelligence and mercy, decide what is best – or what is even acceptable  – for each of (his or her or both) own children.  Nothing is ever simple.  That’s the game of mortality.  We just have to play it the best we can.

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations, Explanations, Just talk, Movie reviews | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Movie Review: Your Dragon

Murphy leaves for home two months from today.

Sometimes the security words on Blogger sites make uncanny sense.  The other day, I got one that was actually one of the coolest non-words I’ve ever seen—thus,

TODAY’S CHALLENGE:

Define: dicasity.

I double dare you.

—-=0=—-

The Review:

How to Train Your Dragon

(one of the most unfortunate, prosaic, pedestrian titles ever)

I don’t usually expect a lot of out Dreamworks.  For me, they’ve been sort of the burlesque of the animation world—long on the slightly bawdy joke, the overblown character with the oversized trousers and the loud, silly voice.  With them, it’s pretty much been The Gag is King.  Sort of the court jester to the classier, more dignified, intelligent and graceful Pixar.

I love Pixar.  And what I love most about them is that they protect the story.  You get meat with them, complex characters and plot that asks questions.  Pixar can move me, often more deeply than most of the recent (read last ten years’) live action films.  I honor them for their quality, their gentleness, cleverness, humor and humanity.

Tonight, Dreamworks really surprised me.  Tonight, they gave Pixar a real run for the money.

I had heard good things about Your Dragon.  We chose to see the non-3D version because G gets cross-eyed behind the glasses and Chaz gets headaches.  And because I figure, if you can’t sell me your story without the gimmick, I really don’t have time or money to waste on you.

Let me just say that I loved this movie.  The balance between humor and drama?  Pretty near perfect.  Complex characters.  A well-worn-because-it’s-always-true tension between father and son, nerd and jocks, convention and the outside-the-boxer—wonderfully told.

The film is visually stunning, the human characters’ movement having grown past the cartoony/balloony Shrek style.  They’ve got hair down, now, has Dreamworks – in spades.  But it was their physics, the physics of fire and flight, that really blew us away.

I’m not going to cover the plot.  There’s nothing that new under the sun being told these days (really, how can there be?).  But when you can surprise me and make me wonder how things are going to turn out – make me fear how they will turn out, then you have told me a story worth telling.  I was moved.  Really, deeply moved.  Funny – I came out of it feeling proud that I’m human, knowing I can do great things, believing in the power of love.

There were great faces.  And when I am that lost in the characters, it makes utterly no difference to me whether they’re drawn or real.

Cliché fulfilled: I laughed, I cried, I bit my fingernails to the quick.

And now I want a dragon, too.

P.S.  We saw the trailer for The Last Airbender, the movie that should have been called, Avatar.  We can’t wait.

Posted in Movie reviews | Tagged , , , | 10 Comments

Me and the Old Man

As of today, G and I have been married for 32 years.  Funny.  Because it’s Saturday, and we weren’t married on a Saturday.  Yes, I know how time works, but it’s funny anyway.

We were married on a day that I thought was going to be the heart of spring.  But the wind was blowing and it was chill and there were no lilacs out yet.  We met with our family and friends at the Salt Lake Temple and I wore a dress my sister had made for me – soft as a cloud.  And when we came out of the temple, I wore a crown of flowers in my hair.  We posed, freezing, the ribbons on my crown blowing madly, for pictures.  We could only have a three day honeymoon because I had to go back to teaching school, and we spent the last day of it on the roof of Steve and Terry’s brand new house, trying to get it shingled before the huge storm broke overhead—laughing and serving up payback for the hours Steve had spent on our new house.  And we got soaked and ate chili.

For thirty two years, I have been married to a man of courage and vision—it takes both to make your own business, bring a new thing into the world and breathe life into it.  He does something that he loves—making music happen, capturing it, holding it between his hands and shaping it into something flawless and shimmering (assuming the performances had that potential in the first place).  For every hour he is paid, he works at least an hour, if not two – helping his clients, keeping his equipment running in good order, learning.

I can say, in all these years I have never known him not to be honest, straightforward, generous almost to a fault, trying his best to be what he feels he should be.  A really good father, a determined and selfless provider. A clever problem solver (he’s fixing the sprinklers that were decimated by the construction even as we speak – and I am keeping my fingers crossed he didn’t just blow up a bunch of pipes in the wall).  He and I did the electrical in this house, and he’s done it again in the additions.  Pretty cool.

He’s also stubborn, bossy and sometimes a little too satisfied that the way he sees things is the way any reasonable person would.  But then, I did marry a guy.

If you asked, we would both tell you that marriage is no walk in the park.  It bends you and challenges you—children exhaust you and try your limits.  I heard a General Authority (LDS) say in conference once that every so often, he will talk to married people who glowingly report that they have never had a single fight.  His conclusion: the people who say that  have never really lived together equally and intimately.  David O McKay used to take walks when he and his wife had differences of opinion.  He used to close the front door with a great deal of energy, too.  “I became very physically fit in those days,” he reported.

Marriage teaches you give and take.  It pounds your pride, because you can’t just walk away from the consequences of it.  It teaches you that you are best as part of a team, and that pulling together may not mean feeling the same way or going about it the same way – but working in harmony for good things.

This isn’t a very romantic way of expressing things.  And yet, when you both get to the top of a hill, breathing hard, hair flying in the wind – and stand strongly together, arms folded, looking back at the path you’ve come along, and then down at the country you have built and earned – and you lean together, shoulder to shoulder, knowing each other and confident in the partnership – it’s good.  It’s very good.

Thirty two years.  Gone in a blink.  Walked every step of the way.  Happy to be here.

Thank you, G.  For always being true, for being strong and kind, for loving the children with everything you are, for keeping the faith—even when you were tired, for being interested in different things than I am, but for adopting the horses as your own.

You’re my G.  And there’s nobody on earth I’d rather stand with.

Loves.  Loves, puppies, Easter eggs, books, sawdust, babies, and now wrinkles.

Amen.

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations, Family | Tagged , | 10 Comments

Easter Scrap

Note: I do hope that everyone who read the comments for the last bit understood very clearly that while Teri is WAY smarter than I am, and I won the debate, it was all in fun – and no animals were injured.

The day before Easter, we woke up to this:

2010-04-03SnowEaster01

At Christmas, this is magical.  In spring, not so much.  I have not brightened these shots any because there was nothing bright about any of this.  Hope wakes up on a spring day like this and pulls the covers back over its head.  The only bit that slips out from under there is the part that says: “It’ll all be gone by this afternoon.”  But the part still under the quilt says, “Yeah.  Then everything will turn to mud.”  And both are right.  Especially when you have puppies.

2010-04-03SnowEaster02

See the airplane wing?  INCHES, I tell you.

2010-04-03SnowEaster03

Puppies: “Ummm – haven’t we seen this stuff before?”  The pine tree is, I will admit, pretty when its flocked like this.

But the next day, Easter and conference (does it get better than this?), we woke up and prepared our traditional breakfast.  We call it “eggs vermasella” because that’s what my mother called it, because that’s what her mother called it.  As a young wife, I was poking around my Betty Crocker cookbook (a wedding present) and found a full page spread of this dish.  And that’s when I found out it was really “Eggs vers Marseilles.”  I guess I inherited the ancient Alabama version.  I’m the one who turned it into a once a year Easter tradition.  And it’s usually made with shelled eggs that retain some of the bleed through color.  I added cheese and bacon to the mix.

I bought new dishes.  Because I have SO much room in my house for new things.  And I hardly have ANY dishes.  These, I saw at Pier 1, and they made me happy, kind of south of the border Provence. We will use them all spring and summer.  Happy, happy.

2010-04-03EasterBreakfast01

2010-04-03EasterBreakfast07

Does this man look happy?  (He is, really.  There was a cheerier shot,but he had his eyes closed.)

Man, after being in charge of bacon frying and egg shelling.

2010-04-03EasterBreakfast06

Girl in lion hat.

After getting here too late to help with anything.  Wait, did she set the table?  Did you set the table?  You usually set the table.  But this time?  Bum.

2010-04-03EasterBreakfast04

Other children with their child.  His sippy cup goes nicely with the plates, don’tcha think?

Two of our spring traditions:

2010-04MourningCloak.jpg

1) The mourning cloak.  A medium sized brown butterfly, outside edge of wings bordered with cream.  Every spring, at the end of March-beginning of April, the Mourning Cloak shows up in our yard like the swallows, showing up in Capistrano.  It flutters around in crazy spirals, lights briefly, takes off again, over and over, dancing.  When we see it, we all run out into the backyard, pick a place, stand stock still with our arms out – and wait.  Inevitably, the MC will end up landing on at least one of us.  I have pictures year after year – the MC on Cam’s head, on Chaz’ open palm, Gin’s wrist, M’s shoulder.  Magical.  It doesn’t usually light on me, because I’m the one with the camera.

This year, I was out with the puppies in the back yard.  When here came the MC, making its erratic circles, evidently looking for the children who no longer live in this house.  I tried to take a picture of him, but he wouldn’t hold still.  So I have put circles around all the the things that might be him in the picture above.  Then, all alone out there under the trees, I put out my own arms and held very still.  Sure enough, he landed on my head.  The softest touch – and then gone again.  To land gently on my open hand.

But the puppies were wild and came running our way, so the MC took off, leaving me feeling a little lost. When he landed on a nearby leaf, I tried to get close enough to do a real portrait.  But puppies — intrigued by my focus — came bursting along, and off he went, not to be seen again that afternoon.

2010-04-09Swallows08

2) Not Capistrano, but close.  In the same way, every year there is a day when the swallows just suddenly appear.  First there are none, then the entire sky is full of them – and when I say sky, I mean everything from the ground up.  You stand in the front yard, and they zoom right past your head.  One year, we realized that there were these little ant things with wings rising awkwardly up out of the grass of our yard into the air.  There were reams of dragonflies darting around the yard (this happens several times a summer), snapping up the winged ants as they rose, sucking them dry, and dropping the husks back into the grass.  And the swallows were – well, swallowing up the dragon flies, right in mid swoop, one after the other.

I haven’t seen the winged ants since, and haven’t noticed dragonflies for a long time—but two days ago, right on time, there were the swallows, dancing, streaming around the house like wind made visible.  Again, I wanted to shoot them, but the dance is amazingly dynamic – all through the yard, then up over the roof of the garage, then filling the air corridor over the street, then way up over the house, dozens of them, swooping, gliding, charging, dropping, zooming.  So I just pointed the camera up and shot, hoping I’d catch more than one.  Which I did.  Finally.

I was alone for this, too.  I said to the puppies – “Do you see them?  They’re back.  You can set your watches now.”

DSC_9633.JPG

This has nothing to do with any tradition, or even with spring.  I just love exposed roots and leaf mast.

DSC_9635.JPG

And this is just the front doorway.  I liked the warmth of the color.

And that’s the whole enchilada.

P.S.  want some fun?

Posted in Family, Memories and Ruminations, Seasons | Tagged , , , , , | 7 Comments

Orm ~ part two,too,to

Now, we are just at the end of the medieval period and cruising toward the renaissance, which England only had because Italy had already tried it and ended up having a really great time.

Up until this period, there wasn’t a whole lot of writing done by anybody.  They didn’t sell reams of paper in those days, and pencils were pretty rare.  The only books were hand copied bibles that came out of dark monastery cells and had to be illustrated so that if 999 out of every 1000 people alive happened to look inside, they could get some idea of what story was being told – because nobody knew how to read.  And what reading and writing there was happened in latin, because it was all about religion, which should be a lesson to all publishers today.

But at our point in time, the human mind was just beginning to stir and to actually think (see Monty Python), and more and more people, wishing to move up the food chain, began to learn the intellectual arts.  This is where spelling comes in.  There is very little point in your sitting down and taking time and effort to turn out a graphic representation on paper of your thought if nobody can ever read it.  If this last observation sounds personal to anybody reading here, good.

So people had to find forms of words that everybody could agree on.  Like “dog” should be spelled “d-o-g” rather than “d-e-a-g” or “d-a-g,” or “dwoag” (which is the New York dialect) or “dahwg” (which is the Texas).  In the spelling game, you are allowed to say what you see any way you like.  But you always have to write the thing in the prescribed way.  (pre-scribed)

At first, it was hard to work out the code.  There were at least six major dialects of Middle English spoken by the folks there (did you know you can drive all the way across England in one day? You could fit the thing inside Texas and still have thousands of cattle-spreads in the land that’d be left over).  Which one of these dialects were you going to take as THE definitive, real way of speaking?

And once you settled that, you had to fight over the actual sounds of written letters.  It was during this time that we lost the “thorn,” the letter that was exclusively the “th” sound.  Too bad about that.  I really liked that letter.  And the “ash” which is a sort of a-upside-down-e that is useful if you have an Irish accent.  Both of these are still used clandestinely by phonologists in dark back rooms of universities, even today.

But still, there were no dictionaries.  Well, there were no books, generally, again—outside of monasteries—and who was going to waste time and paper on something like a dictionary when Scrabble hadn’t yet even begun to be envisioned?

Along comes Orm.  Orm, a twelfth century monk.  Who wrote the Ormulum, one of the first seriously self published works in the language.  Because there were no actually spelling rules already, Orm made up his own: you double the consonant after every “short” vowel.

Thus:

The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog would be written:

The quickk browwn foxx jummpedd overr the lazy dogg.

(Orm obviously did not have to fight MS Word over the writing of this.)

The problems are immediately apparent: writing was taking twice as long as it needed to, and in the style of the day, with the worn tips of the feather pens monks had to use, you had so many “mimims” or vertical strokes in the writing of the letters, reading was like not seeing the meaning for the trees.

But the man had tried.  And it was an intuitive system.  You listened to the way the word sounded, and you knew how many “r”s to write.

Chaucer came along a couple of hundred years later (we are spanning the time from Early Middle English to Late Middle English), and with his borrowed renaissance light, began writing all kinds of randy little rhymes for the entertainment of the now-beginning-to-be educated middle class.  And he wrote these ditties in the East Midlands dialect, which pretty much set that dialect up for life, considering they spoke it in Oxford and London, too.

Read Chaucer and tell me he can spell.

Then jump ahead to the mid eighteenth century and Samuel Johnson.  Sam Johnson, who decided he was going to write the definitive dictionary of dictionaries.  HE was going to show us how to do it.  HE was going to stabilize the language once and for all—and he was going to do it based on the history of words, giving the concept of spelling weight and significance.

And he did just that.

He made mistakes, too.

As in: the word meaning that you’ve borrowed money and you’re going to have to pay it back, and it’s hanging over your head.  In Middle English, there was a word for this: dette.  It had been used for hundreds and hundreds of years, and may have come from a German root of the time (NOBODY KNOWS REALLY – and I can argue this kind of thing quite intelligently, right in the face of writers of modern dictionaries and acceptors of the conventional wisdom).  The word was pronounced just as it looked: dette.  But Sam Johnson decided that forever after (after his book was published, that is), educated English speakers would spell it “debt,” hearkening back to an assumed root in Latin – “debit.”

Even if the derivation were absolutely sure, English speakers had ALWAYS pronounced the thing without a “B.”   Now, third graders in AMERICA and AUSTRALIA have to put a “B” in the dang thing or risk failing their spelling tests.  Even though NO ENGLISH SPEAKER EVER SAID D-E-B-T.

And the word “colonel”?  Yeah, ever get that one wrong?  Ever try to look that one up in the dictionary?  ANY dictionary?  Read this and the light will go on.  You will finally see spelling for what it is: only a social convention that God did not invent.

Now.  When I took French, I was amazed how easily I could spell everything.  That’s because French is a nice, neat language that comes almost whole cloth out of one nice lingual tradition.  Not to say there are not irregularities.  But by and large, you can say something and feel how to spell it.

But our language – our unique (I’d say “blend” but that’s too clean and civilized a word) pastiche of grammars, traditions, irregularities and even cultural influences and connotations – it’s impossible.  Latin, Greek, German, Italian, probably Sanskrit and Lithuainian – not to mention Yiddish – bits all smashed together into one English sentence.

The puzzling thing to me is that I am such a reader—I grew up with a book plastered to my face.  I read the words over and over, a thousand times over—but my brain never memorized the forms.  The spelling of these words should have made sense.  If it had made sense, I’d have remembered and been able to replicate.

So in some ways, we might as well be writing in kanji—except with kanji you’re at least drawing concept pictures.  But what have we got?  A nonsense string of letters that may come out “Carey-Ann” or “Karey-Anne”, or “Kerrie-Ahn” or “Karii-An” or “Cahree-Ahn”  and people get their noses out of joint when you mispronounce their names.

So if I write “pallet,” instead of palette – just remember that Orm would have written the stinking thing “pallett” and never would have given the French root a second thought.

So there.

Anyway, any misspelling you find in my stuff ?  Probably a typo.

Conclusion: spelling is like the dollar – it has no real value unless the person you’re offering it to believes in it.

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations, Explanations, Just talk, mad, The outside world | Tagged , | 10 Comments

At least Orm tried-

I remember a spelling test.  It was third grade I think.  And we used that heavy, yellowish, horizontal lined paper with all the helpful dotted bits to keep your letters straight.  The teacher read out each word v-e-r-y clearly, with the accompanying word-in-a-sentence.  I kind of liked the ritual; calming almost to the point of being soporific. Or it would have been, if I’d had any clue how to spell any of the words.  We corrected our own tests.  And we used really, really soft led pencils.  So I took care of my problem by pressing down pretty heavily,  putting very big “C”s on every word, careful to let the tail pretty much obliterate my spelling of each one of them.

But Mrs. Pay-Attention-to-Detail called me on it.  And from then on, my mother made me write each spelling word ten times.  Which helped in terms of test scores, but didn’t actually help much in terms of real world writing.

When we moved back to Kansas City, I went into the sixth grade there.  The teacher called me up to her desk (maybe after the first spelling test of the year—I don’t really remember) and asked me, sounding a little incredulous, “How do you spell ‘business?’”  And I didn’t know.  I didn’t know so much that my mind was a perfect blank.  I couldn’t even imagine.  I did pretty much figure, after years of being tricked, that if I spelled it the way it sounded, I was going to be wrong.  Which is what I ended up doing, and what I ended up being.  Then she asked me, “Well, how do you spell ‘busy?’”  Bizzy.  Right?  That’s the rule, right?  You double the consonant after a short vowel?

The world has pretty much always been a mystery to me.  The entire world.  And my approach to figuring out any of it has always been intuitive.  Which is why when I try something, if I don’t “get it” in the first fifteen minutes, I just forget the thing and go on with the rest of my life.  Because there are plenty of other mysteries out there—and I can’t waste time actually having to slow myself down learning arbitrary  rules and techniques.

Spelling is not intuitive.  That is, English spelling isn’t.  And I was left duly mystified by the whole concept for a long, long time.  After two decades on the planet, I went to graduate school (which you can do even if you can’t spell)—and several thousands of dollars later, I understood why I had been so mystified: not only is English spelling anything but intuitive; it’s chaotic.

And yes, I am going to tell you why.  I am going to tell you why I spelled “palettes” “pallets” like an idiot, and maybe you can patch up your respect for me, assuming there was any in the first place.

First of all:  English is not a latin based language.  French, Spanish, Italian, Romanian—these are latin based, or Romance languages (which does not mean they are roman-tic).  But English wants to be latin-based.  Wants it be very badly.  Too bad for it.  English is Germanic.  When the Celts in Britain were being hammered by the Vikings from up north (the invading hordes, the coast raiders come inland), the Celts hired a bunch of heathen, brawny, brawling German mercenaries from the following tribes—the Angles, Saxons, Jutes and Picts—to come and protect them.

Sadly, the Celts found themselves between two blond opportunist waves and survived that by hiding in caves and rocky places on coasts and in mountains, all the unsuitable-for-comfort parts of the island, while the invited Germans took up residence, spreading themselves over the green and rolling bits of the place.

And so, Britain began to speak Old High German, which became Old English.  Don’t think you know anything about Old English, by the way.  Shakespearian English is actually known in scholarly circles as “Early Modern English.”  Old English dates back around 800 a.d.  And you actually would recognize some of it.  If it’s a domestic animal on the hoof or paw or a bodily function, and if you could hear past the ancient accent, you’ might get the gist of the Old English word.

After several hundred years, the French – actually the Vikings who had invaded the north of France successfully – turned their eyes to Britain, sailed over and finally took over the place.  This is when Britain began to speak French, and the over-lay of Latin started to have an influence on the grammar and vocabulary of the Anglo-Saxon “natives.”

Oh, by the way, the word “picture?”  It came over on the bodies of the Picts, who were fiercely famous for having their entire bodies tattooed with scary warrior tattoos.  So if you pronounce the word like this: “I have some pitchers to send you,” you are actually talking about water-carrying-vessels and not sweaty warrior pirates tattooed with what they’re going to do to your face.

For many years, the “French” lounged around Britain, trying to murder the celts and grinding the faces of the poor Anglo-Saxon lords—and all of this had the rough-stone-rolling effect on Old English, producing (over a few hundred years) the much sleeker, more economic Middle English.  Which is what Britain spoke when the Anglo-Saxons finally kicked the Frenchoid overlords back over the channel.

This is getting really long.  So I’m going to split it up.  And please do not use this article as any kind of authoritative source, because it is a completely unauthoritative stitching together of numbers of scholarly sources, which are mostly conjecture anyway, and which I am probably barely remembering correctly.

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations, Explanations, IMENHO (Evidently not humble), Just talk, mad, The outside world | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

~Palettes~

(apologies for my spelling.  Hopeless.)

Today, after hours of wrestling with the taxes (both personal and corporate), we found an error IN OUR FAVOR.  Can you believe it?  When does that ever happen?

And today, while I was running to the store for the eye drops Piper needs, now that his eyes have gone permanently dry – and onions – wait.  Could onions cure dry-eye?  Well, maybe we won’t try it.  I found baby clothes.  GIRL baby clothes.  Little summer newborn dresses and cherry cover white onsies trimmed with arches of crimson stitching, and summer plaid over-alls (pink, lime and lavender) lightly embroidered with frogs and lady bugs.  And realized that I have my first girl baby coming, a granddaughter.

I’m not much of a girl myself, but somehow, I am charmed at the thought of a new little girl in my arms.  Will she be Ginna the dancer?  Or Lorri the baseball player?  She’ll be Little Sister whoever she is, wearing red cherry onsies and lime and lavender plaid over-alls.  The rest is a mystery.

DSC_9841.JPG

These pictures don’t have a thing to do with what I’m writing.  I just don’t want to tax anybody’s attention span too badly.

But that’s not what I was going to write about.  I was going to point out that one of the problems with being what I am – a sort of jackess-of-all-trades (and yes, thank you, I know ex-zactly how that sounds), mistress-of-none—is that no matter what crafty art or skill you take up, you need a palette.  You can’t just buy one bit of something and be done with it.  You have to gather—everything needful.

I’m thinking about this because I’m trying to corral all the yarn I’ve been gathering.  What I had before – fall sweater yarns, some wool, some acrylic blends –  won’t do for horses or eggs or donkeys or Siberian huskies.  And I’m so Waldon-ized now that I wrinkle my nose and hold up my skirts when I step around the polyesters.  And Julie does her things all in cotton –

But it’s not just fiber in the palette, it’s color and weight and texture too.

And the felting: fiber.  Not only wool, but type of wool: merino?  romney? top?  raw? long fiber or short?  And color.  And texture.

DSC_9843.JPG

I will admit, I have about thirty pretty big boxes of cotton quilting fabric – wonderful fabric I can’t afford to even look at for fear I’ll feel the pull of it.  And if you do glass, it’s the same thing – color, texture – antique or cathedral or shot?  And if it’s wood – oh, the wood – the type, the grain, the hardness.  And wire – color, gauge – square, round?  And all the same with beads – a million kinds, colors, shapes with the accompanying chains and spacers and closures.

If I had a studio, it would have a million drawers – walls of them, drawers under windows (there’d be a lot of those, too), over the windows—each one full of kinetic energy.

I don’t need drawers for words.  Not yet.

The over-arching palette is the one for tools: needles, both tiny and huge, smooth and barbed – lathes and cutters and pliers, and awls and soldering irons and pins and clever things for small tricks.

And the idea palette– books of pictures and advice.

But the thing is—beyond the problem of space and organization of these things (because once you start to gather a palette, there’s a huge danger you’ll forget what you’ve got and go get more) – here you are, sitting in the middle of an embarrassment of raw materials.  And now you’ve got to do something with—at least SOME of it.

If you haven’t already worn yourself out just taking it all in.

Once, G said to me, “It’s all right if you collect quilt books.  You don’t have to use them.  You can just collect them.”  And I could be pretty happy just looking at the pictures.

But I can feel a huge pull to do more: I run up to a pile of colors and things and dance around it, hands itching to do something.  I just never can settle on one thing.

I think I want to know – am I the only one who’s like this?  Standing right there at the banquet table and not able to figure out what to put on the plate?

But I’m willing to bet, whatever idea I finally come up with, I’ll figure out pretty quick: however much wool or fabric or glass I’ve got— none of it’s quite right for the project I’ve got in mind.

So, okay, when I die—watch for the estate sale (assuming that my girls learn from my mistakes).  It’s going to be one heck of a party.

DSC_9846.JPG

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations, Making Things | Tagged , , , | 11 Comments