More Scrap

 

More little scraps.
To begin with: the company I keep.
This is me, kind of dorky, always communicating (cry for those who live with me), a little dumpy, but well meaning and not terribly exciting.

2009-05-MeYuck01

 

This is my cat.  Mine, because I drew it.  I used to draw him a lot.  So I stuck him here.

KittyMomLineartSM

This is my buddy.  My bosom buddy, if you can use that word in a family blog.  Her name is NOT Jezebel, even though she dressed like this and even went grocery shopping and kid picking up in this rig.  She is not dumpy, you will note.  This is why I keep her around, to make me look good.

09-04-25RachelJezbel03

Perhaps we will call her Solome.  Yes.  Let’s do.

09-04-25RachelJezbel02

Down to the footwear.  Like I’d ever wear a toe ring.  It’d drive me nuts.  You will note, as I am sure she will, having not seen these shots before, that her skin is not unmarked about the ankle.  This is because she has seven children and can face off a twelve hundred pound horse, who will then sit in the dirt and shiver (the horse, not Solome).

09-04-25RachelJezbel13

Sultry has its applications.  I could never even come close to pulling this look off.  Any man I turned to with obvious intent would immediately become lost in the dark circles under my eyes.  My Solome’s hair curls all on its own, too, which I think is kind of cheaty.  Of course, the general effect of her loveliness is somewhat compromised by the  big, ugly plastic toy debris behind her.  It’s hard to be a woman of mystery when at any moment, a small boy may launch himself at you and beg for sandwiches.  Still – 

09-04-25RachelJezbel11

Here, she demonstrates some of her dance moves.  Very slinky and romantic and Nights of Araby, I think.

09-04-25RachelJezbel12

But this one is my favorite.  GO,  SOLOME!!!

09-05-02-Brothers03

These men are not watching Solome (they better not be).  Instead, they are being the production crew in the studio for Joshua Creek.  One belongs to me (cry for him), one is my brother-in-law, one is my brother in-law-in-law.  And one is my brother in law-in-law-in-law (and why he is there, I am not quite sure.  But since he is again a new daddy, I will let him stay).

09-05-09Spring441

This is Chaz making romantic and very oily Japanese Inari rice balls so that we can feed them to the fox demons that I swear live in our backyard.  Actually, we ate the dang things ourselves, and they were good, and it was only after I’d eaten one that I realized that just because something is Japanese and inscrutable, does not mean it will not make you fatter.  It isn’t fair that, when a child moves home, she should take over your kitchen and make Danish of ANY nationality.  But this one does it constantly.  She weighs 115 pounds.  I ask you, does this seem fair to you?

09-05-02-DogsPorch06

This old dog, asleep on the front porch, is older than I am.  Maybe that’s why we love each other so much.

Posted in dogs, friends, Fun Stuff, Images, Making Things | Tagged , , , | 13 Comments

That’s my baby –

If you click here, you’ll be able to see the film M was working on before he left on his mission.  He was one of three (I think) producers.  It’s only a few minutes long.  But it so, so beautiful.

It’s called Kites.  It’s in the little window up on the left.  Start it, and then you can take it full screen if you like, but the res isn’t so good that big from this site.

I wish I could remember the name of the animator who did the faces.  What a gift.

Anyway.  It breaks my heart.

love,

K

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations, Making Things, The kids | 7 Comments

Disclaimer

Evidently (the evidence being in the comments here), the wicked young Master VW (son of this wild mother) went home from my energetic (I’m always energetic talking about these things) Sunday School lesson and told everybody in the world that I had said “hell” twenty three times in Sunday School class.

May I point out, in my own defense, that it’s hard talking about hell as a concept and as a scary, stinking reality if I don’t call it what the heck it is?

Huff.

 

I was going to stick an illustration in here – did you know you can google “pictures of h-ll”?  Might be a good move if you’re planning a vacation there any time soon.  Anyway, I’m not putting any of those up because, first of all, I don’t think any of the people who supply them have actually been there – I mean, to the actual place, although judging from their imagination, one might be tempted to think they are natives.  And second of all, they were all incredibly gross and ugly and distressing, as you might imagine.  Except don’t.  Imagine, I mean.  So I am supplying this picture instead, so that you will know by opposites when you are definitely NOT there: (Take a deep breath.  Clear your mind.  Do not mistake the over-exposure of the grass as heat, please):

2009-05-11-EmmaFriends32

Nice.  A good washing out of the soul – 


Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations | 6 Comments

Scrap Quilting

Not really.

Scrap life-ing.

Bits and pieces out of my image library. Not showing off my technique, just cool little moments.

09-04-08KScootseqn}10
Grandson

09-04-14ParkWomen02

Young moms doing lunch in the park.  They let me stay.

09-04-14skye01

Old dog.  Losing his hearing.  But never his imagination.

09-04-15Planemaker11

Thirty years, we been making music with these dudes.  Behind the hot, sick music – silly guys.

09-04-15SnowEggs03

Snow on forsythia.  Not that long ago.

09-04-18Horses08

Muddy, wonderful horse.  Fancy legs in the muck.

09-04-17Anniversaryr05

What G gave me for our anniversary

09-04-20FosythiaPine01

Forsythia draped in pine.  Even less long ago.

To be continued . . .

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations, Horses, Images, Images of our herd in specific, Just life, Seasons | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Just a lovely gown

            On Saturday our mailman, Deloy, brought Chaz a package.  Sadly, G and I were not there when it came; we were out at the pasture messing with fences.  We’re always messing with fences.  Even when G has something else to do, he’s stuck out at the pasture messing with me messing with fences.  This is his life. 

            We were actually just moving furniture, and ended up making this kind of cool little outside holding stall, grass bottomed with a trailer in the middle of it.  Both of which things were problematic.  Grass inside of a fenced off area just keeps growing till you get arrested for not having a goat.  A horse inside of a fenced area (put there to eat down the grass) that has a trailer in it (the stall, not the horse) can create havoc (the horse, not the trailer).  Which the colt did.  Got his foot tangled up in the brakes lines and pulled out all of the connections.  This was not a good thing.  It is also why nobody should ever buy either a colt or a trailer, and if they do, they should not put them together in a grass stall.  Not what you need when you already have a bunch of medical bills that you thought you’d paid, but you evidently hadn’t. (And vet bills – if Piper’s old-man meds are any indication of our human future, it doth not bode well.)

            But the point was the package, which Deloy took away again, leaving in its place a slip of rusty colored paper announcing the fact that Chaz was now going to have to go to the post office and fetch the package herself.  Which she did.  This morning.  There was some confusion—Deloy had packed the thing up again, meaning to deliver it to us again today, which he had NOT indicated on the rusty paper. But he had not yet ridden out, so they caught him and retrieved it and she got it and opened it in the car (on the way to her work at the Museum of Peoples and Cultures, but not while she was driving).  Then she called me.

            “I got a LOVELY GOWN,” she announced.  “It’s BEE-U-ti-Ful.”

            This was not the place where my day fell apart.  Long before that moment, there was this dream that I was trying to make some kind of meat dinner, and decided to take a slice of it to Pam Schow on a Styrofoam plate, which would have been fine, except there was evidently gravy on it, and then rice, and finally black beans which kept falling off when the people, the million people on the sidewalk (now I’m living in a city?) kept bumping me, and the plate kept sagging and spilling the beans . . .

            You’d think awaking from such a l-o-n-g and s-t-u-p-i-d dream—anything after it would have to look up, right?  But no.  I had spilled black beans in my soul and I couldn’t shake ’em.  And a job I had to do for a software font company that I didn’t know how to approach, and besides, I’m always disoriented after a fun weekend during which I did nothing particularly spectacular.

            So the second she told me about the lovely gown, I knew I needed one too.  I NEEDED A LOVELY GOWN. 

            And why??  You cannot wear a lovely gown when you are going to a dusty, oily, horse-sweaty barn to feed horses.  You cannot wear one when you are moving fence (yes, I did more of that today, thank you).  Or when you work out on a treadmill, and then go back out to bring the horses in off the grass.  Or when you wrestle a dog down to the ground so you can drop fake tears in his eyes.   All of which I do every dang morning before breakfast, which I do not eat till after lunch.

            And beyond that, a Lovely Gown would seem like over-kill if all you did all afternoon was sit on an oversized exercise ball and color-correct twenty-two year old family snap shots.  Which is the rest of my life.  Until I go out to feed the horses for the night.

            So what would I do with a LOVELY GOWN?????  But still, I desire it.  I YEARN for it.  Especially if it makes me NOT LOOK FAT.  I have spent the day disgruntled and disappointed.  I am trying to figure out why, why, why  or what, what, what is fueling all this?  Is it just the surprise I needed?  Because all the cool little packages that come, come for Chaz  because she nickels and dimes herself away on tiny ebay things like Disney pins for trade and lots of beads for projects we haven’t decided to do yet.  (Where did she learn this, I wonder?)  Or maybe it’s a moment’s fancy, care-free elegance I crave?  Or a fairytale day, springing out of the head of spring fully planned and funded by somebody else?  Somebody who knows what would absolutely DELIGHT me better than I KNOW MYSELF???

            Maybe it’s something like the end of a dreaded final in a class I’ll never have to take again.  Or the IRS sending me a letter thanking me for all my years of contribution, but  that they really don’t need any more of my money, thank you.  Some kind of freedom or confidence.  Like, I need to magically ride the colt and have him fly like an angel, me cupped carefully and safely on his sentient and loyal back.

            Something like that.  Not a cupcake.  They are too small and the consequences are too big.  It’s something else I want.  Something wonderful.  Something I actually probably already have.  Which would be fine, except if I DO already have it, I have to pay taxes on it and keep it clean.

            So this was my day.  Do you ever feel this way?  Just suddenly yearn to break free and fly up with your arms out and your face in the wind and not have even one stinking worry about anything?

            I was out at the barn, putting my Zion away after our boring (for him, not for me), quiet little ride, when Chaz called.  My cel ring for her is her voice saying, “Hello Mommy – something terrible just happened to me, Mommy – “  Every time I answer it, I hope that this silliness never comes true.  Today I answered saying, “What terrible thing happened to you?”

            “It’s my gown,” she said sadly.  She was finally home, finally able to try it on.  “It doesn’t fit over my hips.”

           

              Well – yep.

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations | Tagged | 10 Comments

remember

DadFlyBoySmall

My dad, the fly boy.  He came home safely.

There are two things I cannot look at straight on, two things of terrible beauty that cost the heart almost more than it can bear.  One of them is the atonement.  The other is the dreadful cost of freedom.  We are not real used to paying deeply for things anymore.  Pick up the clicker, aim it, and magic happens—you don’t even have to stand up and cross the room.  Kids who go to college expect to be given jobs, good ones.  When we flush the toilet or take out the trash, the consequences of our consumption are neatly carried away and dealt with – by whom, we do not know.

 My generation, and certainly the ones who have followed, were handed freedom (simple word, tremendous meaning) in a hardy little box, wrapped in shiny foil, topped with a ready made bow.  Sometimes, it seems just too much work even to unwrap the dang thing.

JackSailorSmall

In the Navy.  WW II

 Our ancestors wanted us to have a better life than they had, easier, more fun—one with far less risk and heartache.  The only thing is, what they could only imagine, we have taken for normal.  We live in a happy illusion of safety, the assumption of neat and happy endings.

But the price paid for our assumptions beggars us.

 The way I see it, the people we should be remembering today – with energy and awe and horror – are not just those who have died in the shoring up of human freedom and dignity, suffering in the mud and the thunder of violence, some in the freezing hell of winter.  But also those who were willing to take the risk of dying, who went to war, who put themselves in harm’s way knowing that they might not come back at all.  Might never, in fact, be found.  Or worse – or braver – knowing that they could come back from their fight sightless, or without legs – ugly, marred, crippled, horrified out of sleep forever.  And those who supported the work of the soldiers and the pilots and the sailors—all who went out of home and took the chance of dying, of heartbreak – or worse – in order to protect the things we have held so dear.

JimGasMaskSm

Dad’s dad.  WW I  

He, too, came home safely.  But I think he never really left the military behind.

JimEnd-1Small

Without the gas mask.

And what about the mothers who sent off their sons and daughters, and the wives and husbands who have kissed their loved ones good-bye?  The children, waiting for fathers, for beloved brothers—huddled around radios, waiting for mail, now, hoping for internet contact.  For proof that their hearts might last another day.

JimSmallMilitPort

In full regalia

In New England on the coasts, houses used to be built with towers at their very tops, crows’ nests, so that those left on the safe shore could climb the stairs, to lean out over the railing, faces into the wind, searching for the tiny flash of a sail, the first sight of a boat coming home safely.  How many people have lived, for an impossibly difficult time, in just such a place—leaning into time, afraid of doorbells, holding their breaths with hope beating at their eyes?

Tyner20-300

I don’t know the names of these two men.  They are my father’s mother’s father’s father’s people.  Maybe, then, my own great, great, great great uncles.  And theirs was a terrible, terrible war.

 And for what?  We believe that the world can be saved.  We believe that everyone can have a nice little house with a white picket fence and happy, healthy, safe children playing behind it.  We believe that all people should be able to sleep securely, never fearing the dark or the morning.  We also believe that people have to stay vigilant, protect these things, offer them to God and put them in his keeping as they do what they have to do to keep peace, to defend what is dear.

Tyner13 300nashville

I do not believe that what has happened to our country in the last few months is right or healthy or intelligent.  I feel that we’ve broken faith with those who have paid.  I think we have lost sight of our responsibilities in the last many decades, having taken far more than we’ve given, and having thought far shorter-of-sight than any sane person should ever do.

Now, every day, after my own endless work—I feel that I am leaning into the wind, looking for the great ship, hoping  that everyone I love will be safe on it, and that the catch brought in through hard, responsible, skilled labor will be enough to keep us for another few days – safe, healthy and at peace.

I wonder how long it will be till that ship comes home again.

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations | Tagged , , | 10 Comments

And more on the subject

                 In the last several years as I’ve played in Facebook, dipping into discussion boards, and in particular, discussions that concern religion, I’ve been—not surprised, really—but almost puzzled by some of the attitudes I’ve found there.  I love answering questions about LDS beliefs and I like honest discussion, but I don’t like arguments and debates, especially when the person on the other side of them seems to have this rabidly passionate need to blow me and mine out of the water.

                 I have no need to blow anybody else out of the water – unless, of course, they’re advocating child pornography or slavery or genocide or legalizing damaging stuff.  Even then, I would take no triumph in trumping their arguments (which you never really can do with rabid folks), no pleasure in achieving a rhetorical smack down (which I am not equipped to do anyway).  But to go after somebody’s personal beliefs like you thought you had some heavenly mandate to destroy them?  I just think that’s weird.

                 I also don’t understand the tension between science and religion.  I’ve said that before.  Then again, when you consider that religionists are always in each other’s faces, and that scientists are always in each other’s faces, I suppose it’s no surprise that the two groups, mixed, would create a certain amount of havoc just naturally.

                 Two of the points I’ve heard/read over and over in the religious discussions are these:

1) You can prove the Bible but you can’t prove the Book of Mormon and

2) Whichever LDS prophet they’re attacking can’t be a prophet because look: he didn’t see THIS coming in the future – or whatever.

                 My answers to these things are fairly simple:

1) Poppycock.

2) Prophets are not fortune tellers.

                 I say Poppycock because you can’t prove the Bible.  I don’t even know what that’s supposed to mean.  Are we referring to video footage?  Legal documents?  Photographs?  Of the flood?  Of Daniel in the Lions’ Den?  Of the writing on the wall?  Of Moses on the mountain?  Of Christ healing the blind?  How do you prove these things?  And anyone who does any delving into the history of the origins of the Bible finds a magnificent mess of shoddy record keeping, politics, philosophy and debate.  In the end, you pretty much have to take the bible on faith, believing that God steered the pertinent documents through that mess to survive, neatly printed and nestled in our bookshelves, which is how we take the Book of Mormon (along with the Bible).  People who live in glass houses shouldn’t run around without their clothes on.

                 And the prophets thing.  Do I believe in prophets?  Might as well ask me if I believe in the scriptures.  My answer is yes.  Yes, I do.  I believe in Abraham and Moses and Deborah and—yes, I believe that God is real and that he chooses certain people to deliver messages for him, messages significant of the time and place and circumstance.  In many cases (most?) the prophet of authority is also the religious leader of the people who believe in God.  Does this seem outlandish to me, believing in a powerful being I can’t see or hear, and expecting messages from him to come from just some person who claims authority?  Well – yeah, I suppose it could seem that way.  And yet, following my inner compass, I find this as likely as any number of tiny to great miracles we take for granted as normal every day we live.

                 Does it make sense to me that after thousands of years of prophets interfacing people and God that suddenly, the heavens would simply go silent?  Like we’re so smart and techno and civilized and educated now, we don’t need such messages?  Like the old folks of history were children, needing parenting – but we’re the grown-ups of history and don’t need it?  Or like God went away.  Or like he thinks we’re perfect now?

                 Sure.  Right.  That makes perfect sense.

                 So here is a modern day person who believes in a modern day prophet explaining her understanding of what a prophet actually is.  Prophet=job.  Like teacher=job.  Or engineer, or president, or father=job.  A man is, more or less, engaged for the job.  And what is the job?  It is to lead, to course correct, to advise, to teach—and to pass on instruction from God, who still remembers we’re here.  A prophet is, then, the authorized representative of God, the official mouthpiece, the ambassador, the guy with the notarized creds.

                 We LDS haven’t done much Red Sea trekking lately – well, wait.  I guess leaving ancestral homes, crossing the ocean and walking across the continent of the US back in the 1800s would certainly count as that.  But very lately, the journey hasn’t been physical – but it’s been ethical, philosophical, spiritual.  As real a trek as Moses’, only in a mental dimension.  Would I want to do that walk alone?

In our Gospel Principles lesson manual it’s explained like this:

A prophet is a man called by God to be his representative on earth. When a prophet speaks for God, it is as if God were speaking. A prophet is also a special witness for Christ, testifying of His divinity and teaching His gospel. A prophet teaches truth and interprets the word of God. He calls the unrighteous to repentance. He receives revelations and directions from the Lord for our benefit. He may [my emphasis] see into the future and foretell coming events so that the world may be warned. [This is IF it suits the purposes of God.]

A prophet may come from various stations in life. He may be young or old, highly educated or unschooled. He may be a farmer, a lawyer, or a teacher. Ancient prophets wore tunics and carried staffs. Modern prophets wear suits and carry briefcases [that was my favorite part]. What, then, identifies a true prophet? A true prophet is always chosen by God and called through proper priesthood authority.

 

                 Now.  About science and religion?  Is everything in the Bible to be taken literally?  Did Noah’s flood cover the whole earth?  Was it only a locally catastrophic phenomenon? Answer: I don’t know.  What difference does it make?  If the story was physically true, world-wide, local, metaphorical – what’s the diff?  If it’s in the Bible because God wanted it there, and if there’s a lesson to it, then it’s important.  Can it be proved?  Meh.

                 This is one of my favorite things, a little passage from one of the discourses of Brigham Young, the trekking prophet from our early days, and the engineer of Salt Lake City:

                 Our religion will not clash with or contradict the facts of science in any particular. You may take geology, for instance, and it is true science; not that I would say for a moment that all the conclusions and deductions of its professors are true, but its leading principles are; they are facts—they are eternal; and to assert that the Lord made this earth out of nothing is preposterous and impossible [see Abraham 3:24; D&C 131:7]. God never made something out of nothing; it is not in the economy or law by which the worlds were, are, or will exist. There is an eternity before us, and it is full of matter; and if we but understand enough of the Lord and his ways we would say that he took of this matter and organized this earth from it. How long it has been organized it is not for me to say, and I do not care anything about it. … If we understood the process of creation there would be no mystery about it, it would be all reasonable and plain, for there is no mystery except to the ignorant. This we know by what we have learned naturally since we have had a being on the earth (DBY, 258–59).

                 If it’s truth we’re after, shouldn’t we look everywhere for it?  Why would religious souls be afraid of science, and science afraid of religion?  Does it not make sense that the God who created a world that runs like a well-oiled machine (when allowed to) did it by scientific means?  Would anything else make sense at all?  Religion is NOT magic.  Religion is supposed to be the study of God, godliness, the nature of man, the purpose of existence, the truth of the nature of EVERYTHING.

                 And to that end, while we do respect all prophets from all times, the prophet who is called for our time and our culture and our world is the one who trumps them all.  And he will not contradict any of the others in the basics of the gospel, but may in the application of the principles of the gospel – like, our young women are advised to be modest in this day and time; that does not indicate that their hems should be exactly what Brigham’s young women were instructed to wear.   Or as Rachel said over the pulpit today, God’s revelation to Adam did not instruct Noah how to build the ark.

                 Running out of steam again.  This stuff has just been on my mind.  Mostly because Rachel gave a stunning talk about it today in church.  Lovely.

                 So anyway, there you are.  Then end of the Sabbath day, the end of my religious diatribe.  Brought to you by my barn full of horses, the rain and hope for a better world.

                 Let the church say, “Amen.”

            

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations | Tagged , | 9 Comments

How we see things ~

 Or, more accurately, how I see how we see things, the “we” being LDS people.  I do not usually write a lot about the spiritual aspect of things, not in specific.  I save that for the appropriately titled page.  But here I am on Sunday, when I’m supposed to rest from my labors.  And I suppose that trying to work out mortal life on paper could be considered a labor—like walking around Disney World non-stop is a labor.  The caveat: THIS IS MY OWN WAY OF SEEING IT.

And besides, I have a lesson to deliver in a couple of hours, so this is what I am thinking of: the meaning of life.  And so here I am, thinking with my fingers. 

Some people think that LDS people are not “Christian.”  I think this is arrogant of them, as though they invented the brand and there’s some kind of copyright on the content.  In my book if you believe in Christ, and you use the bible, you have every right to figure that you’re at least some kind of Christian.  But in some ways, I guess in that majority-rule branding sort of way, they’re right.  Because some of the things we believe are very different from what many mainstream protestants and Catholics count as dogma.

We believe that we – you, me – have existed since the beginning of – well, whatever the very beginning was.  That we are made of eternal stuff, and that God gave us our us-ness.  And that he designed a plan, a plan by which we – intelligent raw material as we might have been – could become more, become as like him as we are able.  Realize, in other words, our potential.  We believe there was a sort of conference held, before the earth was made, and the plan was explained – that we would become mortal, taking on these bodies and this physics and this configuration of linear time (sort of like going on a survival excursion), and in the process of the experience, prove ourselves – to ourselves and to him.  Become or not become.  Choose, in very real terms, what we will be when we come out the other side.

There were many catches – pain, sorrow, suffering, fear, confusion, too much to choose from – but the most dire was this: that once we had made this choice and taken on a mortal body, we could never return to a state of being that would let us once more walk in our Father’s reality with him.  In taking on the body, we were lost forever to that state.  We would have no power to change that.

And so the elegant and awful centerpiece of the plan: that One would come, as we had come, taking on a mortal body, living a mortal life – but being half mortal, half immortal – a teacher, a brother to us on every possible level (including a common mortal experience) – and he would become, in the end, the sacrifice – for all of the rules we were going to break along the way, the mistakes, the faltering in kindness, even the cruelty and stupidity and greed that put us deeply in debt to the law of the plan – He would pay that debt, taking responsibility for our imperfections and tragic lapses.  He would answer them all with his innocence.

And we would be free to choose.  Free to make our choices – to eat too much or to use our heads, to grab or to offer, to steal or to bless, to destroy or protect – all up to us.  Each of us, with the capability of changing the world for others, for the good or for the evil.

And when that One, taken by us, brutally treated, finally murdered in his more than complete innocence, died at our hands, that death would satisfy the rules of this reality.  By that death, then, all were saved.  All would be resurrected, none lost.  The door, once shut tight, is flung open, the grave, which has more to do with being shut out from our Father than with laying down a body, gives up those who were once, by their choice to become mortal, damned.

“Who shall I send?”  God asked, meaning, who will he trust to do this thing?  Who could he trust to commit to such a staggering responsibility?  Because once the plan began, all those hosts of spirits who had committed were lost – who could he trust not to let them languish forever?  Who would not just change his mind and give up?  Who would be brave enough, true enough, strong enough – be possessed of so much love – as to take on this part and see it through to the remarkable and terrible end without faltering?

And Christ said, “Here I am; send me.”

As we knew he would.

But then Satan stepped forward and said the same thing.  And went on to explain the flaws in the Father’s plan – too chancy.  How could you give these idiots (he didn’t say that, as far as I know) control over their own lives?  Under this plan, they were just going to screw up over and over and over again.  They’d never forgive each other.  They’d mess up everything.  They’d never, on their own, realize their potential, and the whole thing would be a waste of time.

He offered a slightly different plan.  He’d make sure that each person made the right choices.  He’d protect them from themselves.  He’d compensate for the short-sightedness, the selfishness.  He’d intervene so that there would be NOTHING to sacrifice for.  Life would be perfect.  Everyone would love him.  No mistakes.  No ugly bulges.  No pain.  No sorrow.  No tragedy.  And certainly, no one being able to harm or interfere with another.

The Father refused him.  And in a fury, an explosion of spleen, a rage of frustrated ambition, Satan stormed off, shouting to the hosts, inviting those who wanted a sure eternity, a peaceful and certain fate, to follow him.  And a third of them did.  A third of them left with him, maybe thinking that God would change his mind, eventually, and choose the safer way.

But God didn’t change his mind.  And neither did Christ.  And so here we are, invited and taught on one side, beleaguered and harassed on the other by those who are still furious, who hate us, who have a vested interest in the failure of the plan.  By those who spend their eternity in hate and envy and frustration and vengefulness of heart.  By those, in other words, who live in hell – and have no way out for all eternity.

We LDS do not speak much of Hell.  By virtue of our choosing Christ in the first place, of our taking on the mortal body and trusting him—by virtue of his honor and love and sacrifice, his Atonement, in other words – hell is out of the picture for us all.  The formal hell, that is.

And that philosophy makes us different.

There are other hells – the hell of helpless regret.  The hell of opportunities forever lost.  The hell of really knowing what you have done, the harm, the hurt, and that you can’t go back and erase it.  The hell of loneliness and of pain and of human rejection (both of the doing and the receiving).  Many, many hells.  But those, we build for ourselves.  We are not sent there.

So, what about our mistakes?  Our stupidities?  Our brutalities?  What about our goodness?  Our being true to the law?  Our choosing what is right and good?

Our works?  Obeying the commandments?  Practicing mercy?  All of those things?  Why bother with repentance?

Is anyone ever perfect?  Are prophets perfect?  Have you read the Old Testament—because if you have, you know the answer to that question.  All are saved from death, from the hell of following a person who hates God and keeps minions as mirrors to soothe his forever dissatisfied ego.  But all of us have just as much opportunity to turn themselves into a duplicate mass of seething unhappiness and anger.

Repentance, on the other hand,  is a tool of happiness.  Of peace.  Of community.  Of the opportunity to build and sustain love.  A window that opens to the scents of spring.  There is never complete safety while we live on this earth.  But, as so many have pointed out (notably done in The Hiding Place), there can be peace even in the deeps of mortality.  But beyond even that is the concept of eternal life.

For us, the popular concept of “heaven,” which really isn’t usually much of a concept past a nice, safe place, is very short of the mark.  Being saved is being able to return to God’s reality.  But that reality has laws and limitations of its own.  In it, we are safe from Satan and Satan-like dangers.  In it, we don’t fear for our lives.  We can go on without fear forever.  Which is a nice thing.  But when you think about it, if that’s all there is to your existence, that and singing praises, heaven begins to sound pretty darn boring, really.

The way I see what we believe, our “works” here, our behavior, the habits of thought and feeling and action we develop during our mortal experience – they are us when we walk through the veil into the next experience.  If we were selfish here, we’re selfish there.  If we depend on chemistry to calm us down or make us mellow (‘m talking about emotionally, here – not clinical emotional states) – we’re going to be in trouble making it where there’s no such crutch.  If we depend on money to define us, or even more fundamentally, if we depend on ascendancy over others, social hierarchies, status to define who we are, what joy does heaven have to offer?

So we believe that our comfort and happiness in the after-life depends a whole lot on our “works” here.  And there, just like here in some ways – if you train yourself to run a marathon, you can run a marathon – if you don’t do the work, you don’t have the muscles and you can’t run one.  No big loss if you don’t really WANT to run one, huh?

If sex is what you’re all about – well.  Or power.  Too fixed in the short-term business of earth – remember all those jobs nobody has anymore?  The guy who delivered the ice from door to door? The expert on eight-track tapes?  The people who ran the Edsel plants?  Yeah.  All dressed up and nowhere to go.

If you train to understand physics, engineering, math – you can fix things, invent things, do things that you couldn’t otherwise.  but maybe you don’t care about that.  If you go to med school, study hard, learn enough to pass the exams, do your residency, satisfy the requirements to achieve a license to practice, you can do that useful work in the world.  If you don’t – you can’t. The law won’t let you, for one thing.  But there’s also the fact that you can’t do heart surgery without knowing what you’re doing (they call that murder).

So, the more prepared you are for the atmosphere and operating systems that make up God’s reality, the more freedom you have to move, to create, to praise, to solve problems, to serve, to create community, to do good things – to serve God himself – after this earthly experience is over.  The healthier your spirit, the more capable after.  The more obedient, the more you keep your covenants, the more ready you are to serve (see the Ten Virgins on that one).

Okay.  This is way, way long and preachy, and I have to get dressed for church and maybe even take a look at the hymns before I get up there in front of everybody and make a fool of myself (why should today be different).  So I’m going to stick this up there.  And maybe take it down later, if on second reading, it turns out to be way stupid.  But thanks for helping me think the lesson through.  I really appreciate it.  

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations | Tagged | 7 Comments

Mowing

Gin has done  her own study of this, but I find that I  have a little more to say. The odd thing about growing up is the ghosts you run into. I can remember G coming into the house one day—he’d been mowing the lawn, which he now does on a zero turn radius tractor mower (we have about half an acre of grass – not sure you could actually call some of it “lawn”). But we used to mow it (I say “we,” but I don’t mean it) with three good Sears mulching mowers, Dad pushing one, two kids pushing the others.

20090516-IMG_1039

Gin and K’s Frazz, carrying on tradition.  Note the cool green wellies.  This is a bubble mower.  Supreme.

20090516-IMG_1040

Mowing was always a bone of discord in those days. Can you have bones of discord? A ligament of discord. It was on a knee-jerk basis: when Guy’s knee jerked, everybody had to drop what they were doing and man the mowers. I know that his heels were sometimes in danger because of this.

But way back, before we’d added the lot next door to the job, before he had minions, Guy mowed the yard all alone, doggedly pushing our adequate but not fancy mower. And then, one day, Cam got his own mower, and was more than willing and ready to mow with his Dad. Sometimes they worked side by side, but sometimes they ran a contrapuntal pattern, moving first away from each other on a diagonal, then towards again, crossing planes.

1984CamDadMow

It was this G came into the house remembering – eyes pretty full – that little ghost.  These manly crossings were Cam’s finest moments. He’d look up, a pause in his fierce concentration, see his father coming, and then raise one comradely hand—two working men, acknowledging each other as they passed.  The picture above is as close as I came to catching that moment.  Not at all close.

But the thing is engraved on my heart.

That solemn face.

It grew up to be a solemn face (sometimes), and they are still two comradely working men, acknowledging each other as they pass—they’re just closer to the same height. And now they both have sons.

1992M-Mowing

When M came along, he, too, had to have a mower. I don’t, to my sorrow, have a shot of him beside his father. I wish I’d taken one. And they didn’t have the same ritual. But they had the same heart, and they still do.

1992M-mowing2

But I think both of the boys would have killed for a mower that made bubbles.


A note for those who might be interested: this is evidently what happens when you save a PS doc as a .png and then upload it to Flickr – interesting, huh?

1992M-Mowing

Posted in A little history, Family, Memories and Ruminations, The kids | Tagged , , | 10 Comments

With all due respect

One thing my mother said to me many times when I was a young mother myself was, “Never let them think they are the center of the universe.”    I used to nod my head, and filed that advice away with the other things she’d taught me.  But this morning, after I fed the horses, when I was weeding the front planter and fighting off West Nile bearing mosquitoes, I realized that I disagree with her on this.  So I’m thinking out loud here about it for a moment.

I actually think every child should believe he is the center of the universe.  Or at least, your universe.  And he should be right.  Because children who truly believe this—know this—do not, it seems to me, constantly have to prove it.  And beyond that, a person who truly is the center of something tends to want to be responsible for it keeping it healthy.

            Okay, yeah – I know what she meant to say.  She meant, “Don’t spoil your children.”  But even that had an old spin on it, a fifties spin.  The idea here is that children need hardship; they need to get on board with the requirements of real life right from the beginning, because life is hard, and if you don’t work, you don’t eat.  Do a little research on the theory of childhood; it’s very interesting.

            You’re born on the farm—you gotta contribute as soon as you possibly can.

            But I once read a study that said, babies who are picked up and comforted when they cry are far more patient in the rest of their lives; they learn to share more easily, they can wait in line patiently, they don’t stress about being left out.  In other words, they don’t start life with a hole in their hearts.  They know they are the center of the universe, and that confidence and sense of wholeness colors everything else they live through.

            Same with propping bottles.  A child who is held and loved and nursed, bottle or not, is going to have a head start on a sense of peace.   I know I’m speaking in absolute phrases – like I say, I’m just thinking this through.  But as a mother and a teacher, I have to say, the problems I have seen in so many kids, the acting out, the snatching of attention, the worry, the stress—so much of it comes because these children don’t seem to have an anchor; their hearts are not grounded, and so most of their survival energy is given over to trying to secure a place, any place that gives them even the illusion of safety and security.

            So what about spoiling?  Spoiling is the flip side of the neglect coin, I think.  Just another way of not dealing intimately with a child.  You say yes because it’s easier than dealing with the consequences of no.  And the resultant high handed behavior?  Just another manifestation of the need for ascendancy, the need to establish a safe place.

            I think that bringing up a center of the universe child is a cocktail of love, coddling, discipline, truth, example.  You teach the child to work to show him that he is useful and effective as a human being.  You teach him that he is smart because God gives us gifts so that we can do something about the world, serving others with them.  You teach him that he has two eyes that are made to look out – not in.  You teach him to be the quiet hero.  You teach him that we go to church even when we don’t want to because it’s good, and we need to learn obedience.  The same with all good things – weeding, studying, establishing order – you may not enjoy the process, but you are capable of working through that to achieve something.

            You spend time with your kids so that you actually know them.  You don’t reduce them to formulas you can deal with easily.  You look outside of your own patterns.  G and I – our brains work very, very differently.  And our kids each has his or her own discrete and unique operating system.  I learned that early on.  If you’ve got a PC, you can’t go through life trying to run it as though it were a MAC and expect to get any kind of useful result.  And yet so many do that, and end up saying, “I can’t wait to get the kids out of the house.”

             Kids come as themselves.  We discover that on the way, if we are paying attention, if we are open to the idea that the kids are not us, are not sent to right our own failures or follow our successes.  We have to talk to them like they’re people.  We have to explain the very basic things: this is how pride feels, this is what you want to do right now, isn’t it?  How you feel?  Well, this is how you need to try to deal with this.   We are the tour guides, the teachers.  But when you ride a horse, you have to listen (which I still do very badly) with your hands and your eyes and your legs and your sense of rhythm.  How much more complex a dance is it with children?

            And yet, when a child knows that he is the center of your universe, he wants to give you gifts; he’s responsible to you, for you, and sometimes, in spite of you.  He feels like he has, and so he can give.  He can afford to be honest.  He can afford real generosity, both of spirit and of resource, because he is not hovering protectively over his own tiny little, hard won cache.  He isn’t constantly, desperately, trying to steal more.

            The word, “No,” figures prominently in all of this.  But so does praise.  Both have to be used liberally, and with complete honesty and vigor.

            So in the end, yeah – I guess what I’m saying is,with all due respect,  I disagree with my mom about this.

Posted in Epiphanies and Meditations, IMENHO (Evidently not humble) | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments